stumpwm-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl?


From: Jeronimo Pellegrini
Subject: Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl?
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:48:14 -0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:57:43AM -0700, Carlos Konstanski wrote:
> I have just discovered stumpwm.  I love it on my x86 machine, where I
> can let stumpwm run in cmucl.
> 
> On my x86_64 machine, however, I am running into issues.  I need to
> use a threaded SBCL for website work.  This SBCL has the
> much-mentioned keyboard freezing problem when I run stumpwm in it. 

I have been using threaded SBCL without apparent problems. The box
freezes for seconds sometimes, but it is probably because I'm using
some progrmas that do swap a lot.

Maybe this has fixed the issue:

1.0.14.4: increase MAX_INTERRUPTS to 1024
* ...hopefully fixing Stumpwm, and other signal-prone applications.

So, getting the latest git/cvs version may help. But I'm not sure
since I don't know much about it (I just use StumpWM, and it's been
really good so far).

J.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]