[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funded resea
From: |
Darren Schreiber |
Subject: |
Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funded research |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:53:18 -0800 |
I haven't said anything on this topic yet, but I think I am probably
one of the few lawyers on this listserve. For an act of Congress or
a federal agency to be unconstitutional, it has to do basically one
of two things.
1. Not be within the enumerated powers of Congress or the federal government.
2. Violate some right listed in the Constitution or amendments.
Now, the necessary and proper clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause
18) has been interpreted to Congress the authority to do most things
it wants to regarding the appropriation of federal funding. And,
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, gives the Congress the power to law
and collect taxes to pay the debts and provide for the common defense
and general welfare of the US. So, we don't have a limitation of
powers issue here.
And, I can't think of any particular right (remember that there has
to be some right specified in the Constitution) that would be
violated by such limitations on the use of funds.
Therefore, constitutionality is not an issue.
The notion of citizen's consent to taxation and government is
important in a theoretical sense to US government, but we don't live
in a direct democracy where we vote every governmental law, rule, and
regulation up or down. We have representatives who make laws and
agencies to make policy etc. We consent to the law by electing our
representatives and remaining within the jurisdiction of the country.
This is obviously off-off topic, but I thought maybe it would end the
debate on the constitutional issue.
Well, I'm not going to claim to know anything about constitutional
law; but, it seems to me that it could be considered unconstitutional
to appropriate funds from the citizenry and then use those funds
without that citizenry's consent. For any *particular* grant
managed by the NSF, say, to constrain the project to open source
would be above board because the citizenry has consented to
managing these projects on a case-by-case basis. In fact, that's
simply the way it works and has worked for a long time.
--
___________________________________________
Darren Schreiber
Attorney at Law
Graduate Student
Political Science, UCLA
address@hidden
http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~dschreib
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================
- Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funded research, (continued)
- Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funded research, glen e. p. ropella, 2001/11/17
- Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funded research, Marcus G. Daniels, 2001/11/17
- Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funded research, Russell Senior, 2001/11/17
- Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funded research, glen e. p. ropella, 2001/11/20
- Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funded research,
Darren Schreiber <=
- Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funded research, glen e. p. ropella, 2001/11/20
- Combining antropology & complexity science, anyone?, Jurgen van der Pol, 2001/11/27
- Re: Combining antropology & complexity science, anyone?, Norberto Eiji Nawa, 2001/11/27
- Re: Combining antropology & complexity science, anyone?, M Lang / S Railsback, 2001/11/27
- Re: Combining antropology & complexity science, anyone?, glen e. p. ropella, 2001/11/28
Re: slightly off-topic: support open source for publically-funde, matt, 2001/11/19