[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NeXT
From: |
John Eikenberry [MSAI] |
Subject: |
Re: NeXT |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 1996 17:21:41 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 19 Nov 1996, Benedikt Stefansson wrote:
> But what does it entail to port Swarm to NeXT? The NeXT Mach OS used
> Display PostScript, but can anybody fill me in on what the Solaris,HP-UX
> and Windows/NT versions of OpenStep use to drive the GUI?
I think (though am not sure) that they use adobe's display postscript
system. Display postscript is an integral part of OpenStep (its in the
specs). Perhaps they use an X front end to the dps engine. This is the
way the GNUstep people are doing it.
> A port of Swarm to OpenStep would probably create some incompatabilities
> between the vanilla Unix and the OpenStep versions, but the bonus would
> be that the development tools for Objective-C on OpenStep are second to
> none, and this could potentially make the development of Swarm sims
> accessible to a much larger audience. The downside of course is that
> OpenStep is commercial software.
I agree completely. OpenStep is by far the best set of development tools
I've seen. As far as their commercial limitations, take a look at GNUstep
(gnu's free implementation of OpenStep) at:
http://www.gnustep.org
Ciao,
John Eikenberry
address@hidden
______________________________________________________________
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will deserve neither and lose both."
--B. Franklin
- NeXT, glen e. p. ropella, 1996/11/19
- Re: NeXT, Benedikt Stefansson, 1996/11/19
- Re: NeXT,
John Eikenberry [MSAI] <=
- Re: NeXT, Theodore C. Belding, 1996/11/19
- Re: NeXT, Jason L . Asbahr, 1996/11/20