swarm-support
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: getCurrentTime() broken ?


From: Rick Riolo
Subject: Re: getCurrentTime() broken ?
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 07:14:20 -0500 (EST)

I don't know (or have forgotten about) a message
getCurrentTime.  To what object is it sent?
Does it do what I (and Sven, I gather) want with respect
to pre-activity time?  

Anyway, I guess I still like a macro approach, so that
I don't have to worry about which object to send the message to,
making sure that object is accessible from various
other objects/files, etc.
Of course I could write my own macro, perhaps.
Still, it seems like such a basic, oft-used piece of info,
it would be nice to have simple access to it "built-in".
(I even wish I didn't have to include activity.h to get it.)
 - r

ps But I'll admit I've not even thought about what happens
   with complex models with schedules all over the place.

Rick Riolo                       address@hidden
Program for Study of Complex Systems (PSCS)
1061 Randall Lab     University of Michigan
Ann Arbor MI 48109-1120
http://pscs.physics.lsa.umich.edu/PEOPLE/rlr-home.html

On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, glen e. p. ropella wrote:

> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 22:34:11 -0700
> From: glen e. p. ropella <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: getCurrentTime() broken ?
> 
> Rick Riolo writes:
>  > 
>  > I ran into this, too, and I think it should
>  > be considered broken.  Or if you want getCurrentTime()
>  > to act the way it does now, then there should be another macro
>  > that will return 0 before things have started and
>  > return what getCurrentTime() does afterwards.
> 
> Have you tried the message "getCurrentTime?"  Is there a 
> particular reason you want to use the macro instead of the
> normal way?
> 
> glen
> 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]