Re: messages to nil

[Rick Riolo]

Re:
> ...Maybe a GCC upgrade is in order?

Not something I like to hear!!  ;-)
thanks for the info.
 - r

Rick Riolo                           address@hidden
Program for Study of Complex Systems (PSCS)
4068 Randall Lab                
University of Michigan         Ann Arbor MI 48109-1120
Phone: 313 763 3323                  Fax: 313 763 9267
http://www.pscs.umich.edu/PEOPLE/rlr-home.html

On 22 Apr 1998, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:

> Date: 22 Apr 1998 13:41:36 -0700
> From: Marcus G. Daniels <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: messages to nil
> 
> >>>>> "RLR" == Rick Riolo <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> RLR> One more question...can you remind
> RLR> me how I overide a function definition without having gcc give me
> RLR> a "duplicate symbols" error? 
> 
> I notice that in gcc-2.8.1 that there is a file devoted to nil_method, 
> whereas in earlier versions it was a part of sendmsg.c.
> 
> I'd guess that was done on purpose to avoid the linker problems you 
> are having.  Maybe a GCC upgrade is in order?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                   ==================================
>    Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
>    to day usage of Swarm.  For list administration needs (esp.
>    [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
>    with "help" in the body of the message.
>                   ==================================
> 

                  ==================================
   Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
   to day usage of Swarm.  For list administration needs (esp.
   [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
   with "help" in the body of the message.
                  ==================================