[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:
From: |
Ken Cline |
Subject: |
Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock: |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:03:10 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
> >>>>> "KC" == Ken Cline <address@hidden> writes:
>
> KC> Are there guidelines for when to use the Zone's `allocBlock:'
> KC> method instead of `alloc:'?
>
> Always; alloc: was just there for backward compatibility.
Oh, I didn't realize that `alloc:' was deprecated. I must
have missed that.
Thanks!
_________________________________________________________
Ken Cline address@hidden
SAIC VOICE (410) 571-0413
Annapolis, MD FAX (301) 261-8427
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:, Ken Cline, 1999/07/20
- Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:, Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/07/21
- Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:,
Ken Cline <=
- Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:, Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/07/21
- Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:, Ken Cline, 1999/07/21
- 3/4 = 0 ???, DARREN MATTHEW SCHREIBER, 1999/07/21
- Re: 3/4 = 0 ???, Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/07/21
- Re: 3/4 = 0 ???, surak, 1999/07/21
- Re: 3/4 = 0 ???, Rick Riolo, 1999/07/21