[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock: |
Date: |
21 Jul 1999 10:08:16 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) Emacs/20.4 |
>>>>> "KC" == Ken Cline <address@hidden> writes:
KC> Oh, I didn't realize that `alloc:' was deprecated.
Let me restate this in a different way. A new pair of methods,
allocBlock:/freeBlock: were introduced in order to provide info for Zone
counters. alloc: provides this information too (by storing it), but
it wasn't properly aligning the returned memory. I've fixed this.
So alloc:/free: wastes a little memory but has a more convenient interface.
(freeBlock:blockSize: is annoying because you have to remind the Zone
what size the block was.)
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:, Ken Cline, 1999/07/20
- Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:, Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/07/21
- Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:, Ken Cline, 1999/07/21
- Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:,
Marcus G. Daniels <=
- Re: Zone usage: alloc: vs. allocBlock:, Ken Cline, 1999/07/21
- 3/4 = 0 ???, DARREN MATTHEW SCHREIBER, 1999/07/21
- Re: 3/4 = 0 ???, Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/07/21
- Re: 3/4 = 0 ???, surak, 1999/07/21
- Re: 3/4 = 0 ???, Rick Riolo, 1999/07/21