[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: getCurrentTime
From: |
Doug Donalson |
Subject: |
Re: getCurrentTime |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 18:49:18 -0800 |
Marcus,
I think we discovered where the problem was occuring. The same procedure
was being used in initialization (with no active schedule) and during
runtime. I gave Matthew a couple of fixes for that. The question is, what
does getCurrentTime() do when there is no active schedule? Should it return
a time of zero (perhaps the most logical assumption of system state.) Does
it in fact crash instead?
Cheers,
D3
----- Original Message -----
From: Marcus G. Daniels <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: getCurrentTime
> >>>>> "MM" == Matthew M Murphy <address@hidden> writes:
>
> MM> However, when I try the techniques for ascertaining the
> MM> time which are in the faq, problems occur resulting in a segfault.
>
> Do you mean "evidently there are problems that occur resulting in
> a segfault" or "I've bounded the crash so it must be the getCurrentTime"
(or
> gdb shows it)?
>
>
> ==================================
> Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
> to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
> [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
> with "help" in the body of the message.
>
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.