[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd and similar command within code
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: kbd and similar command within code |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 20:03:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:02:09PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
>
> In HTML or Info? The two format should be (it seems to me) handled
> completely differently. I was talking about HTML in that message.
That explains everything! This thread was about Info...
> What you wrote is the right rule for Info, because there is no concept
> of "font".
Perfect.
> But for HTML, like TeX, we can distinguish by font, and therefore quotes
> should only be used for "sample" texts (@samp and @indicateurl). In
> other cases, the switch to tt font is enough to distinguish. (I have no
> idea about Docbook.) Make sense?
Ok. That's basically what you said in the other mail about HTML!
> Anyway, like I said, I don't think it's very important what the results
> are for @code directly inside @code. Nobody needs that, in practice.
Indeed. For the other, I don't think we need quotes as there are
elements.
--
Pat
- Re: kbd and similar command within code,
Patrice Dumas <=
Re: kbd and similar command within code, Patrice Dumas, 2012/08/04