|
From: | grischka |
Subject: | Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bashisms in configure and gcctestsuite |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:28:09 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Compared to the $RANDOM approach this solution is far less random.What was the problem with using just conftest.x as suggested?
And what is the problem with less random? Otherwise I'd suggest to waste time with more useful things, such as a rewrite of tccgen.c or of the macro preprocessor or an interface with other code generators such as TCG or LLVM ;) --- grischka
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |