vile
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vile] When using vileget a vile:dos isn't noticed


From: J. Chris Coppick
Subject: Re: [vile] When using vileget a vile:dos isn't noticed
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:43:01 -0600
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)

Chris Green wrote:
> Not a huge issue, but....
> 
> I have some source files from the MS windows world that have CRLF line
> line endings.  I have added:-
> 
>     // vile:dos
> 
> to the file so that [x]vile automatically starts in dos mode and I don't
> have to deal with it manually.
> 
> However when I open the files using vileget the vile:dos doesn't get
> acted on.
> 
> It's specifically as follows:-
> 
>     If I "xvile commands.c" it comes up with [cmode crlf] on the status
>     line and displays correctly.  The buffer has dos and recordseparator=crlf.
> 
>     If I "xvile somethingElse" and then "vileget commands.c" the buffer
>     settings don't have either dos or recordseparator set.  The status
>     line has just [cmode].
> 
> A ":setl dos" gets me where I want of course so it's not a big issue.
> 


What happens if you "xvile somethingElse" and then ":e commands.c" within
xvile?

   Chris




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]