[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XBoard-devel] Plans for 4.4.2
From: |
Arun Persaud |
Subject: |
Re: [XBoard-devel] Plans for 4.4.2 |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:14:48 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Hi
h.g. muller wrote:
>
>> > 6) Settings file
>
> If we decide that the format of the options in the settings file
> should be the same as that of winboard.ini, then we can
> simply use the existing WinBoard code to parse the file.
since I'm not that familiar with that syntax I can't really say much...
I think though that in the long run having a common syntax file via e.g.
GKeyfiles that is also used by other programs might be an advantage.
Since GKeyfiles looks apperently a lot like ini-files, is that similar
to what Winboard is using anyway at the moment?
As long as the command line options goes, I'm also not familiar with the
winboard one, but I do like getopt ;) and am used to "-" for short
options and "--" for long options, but I have no idea if this is the
same on windows...
cheers
ARUN
- [XBoard-devel] Plans for 4.4.2, h.g. muller, 2009/11/01
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Plans for 4.4.2, Arun Persaud, 2009/11/02
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Plans for 4.4.2, h.g. muller, 2009/11/02
- [XBoard-devel] WinBoard sources missing, h.g. muller, 2009/11/05
- Re: [XBoard-devel] WinBoard sources missing, Tim Mann, 2009/11/05
- Re: [XBoard-devel] WinBoard sources missing, Arun Persaud, 2009/11/05
- Re: [XBoard-devel] WinBoard sources missing, Eric Mullins, 2009/11/05
- Re: [XBoard-devel] WinBoard sources missing, h.g. muller, 2009/11/05
- Re: [XBoard-devel] WinBoard sources missing, Arun Persaud, 2009/11/05