Re: [XBoard-devel] WinBoard sources missing

[Arun Persaud]

Hi

Eric wrote:
> Why don't we just call it 4.4.1, and 4.4.1.1?  This conforms with
> windows versioning, and keeps everything numeric.

would be fine with me, but I think that came up already a while ago and
people wanted to stay with 3 digits... I would also be ok, just calling
this 4.4.2 that way we go a bit faster through version numbers, but then
again, we don't really do releases that often...

> When we release a beta, we'd just bump the last suffix (unless it was 0
> and thus omitted), and name it beta in the tarball.

I think for betas I prefer the 4.4.2.20091105 numbers... since that
allows for easy continues releases independent of alpha/beta status and
it is also one of the ways suggested for GNU projects...

ARUN