[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release
From: |
Arun Persaud |
Subject: |
Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Mar 2016 15:39:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
Hi
> I am not sure if it still makes sense to maintain separate 'stable' and
> 'development' branches. This made sense when we were doing large-scale
> refactoring in the master branch, which would take a long time to be
> presentable, and in the mean time would need a way to fix the occasional
> bug that was reported.
>
> For the near feature it seems that we should integrate gtk3 into master,
> and that already is in a separate branch. I hardly ever touched the v4.8.x
> branch, so I guess we can live without a v4.9.x.
OK. I left everything on master for the moment... I think in principle
it is still a good idea to create a v4.9.x branch, since you never know
if something larger might come up ;) and I also think using v4.8.x and
merging it back into master when needed worked well.
Arun
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, (continued)
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, h . g . muller, 2016/03/09
- Message not available
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Joshua Pettus, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Joshua Pettus, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, h . g . muller, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Joshua Pettus, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, h . g . muller, 2016/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, h . g . muller, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Joshua Pettus, 2016/03/09
Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Arun Persaud, 2016/03/12