Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch

[Mosè Giordano]

2016-09-17 18:41 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer <address@hidden>:
> but what is with the issue of sending patches with
> correspond to my private branches but might include (for you) unwanted
> revsets? That is not acceptable? I should collapse them?

What do you refer to?

> [1]  I see hg facing the same fate as Xemacs, beautiful but not preferred
>      by most users....

I don't have anything against Mercurial, and you can work with hg-git
if it works well, but it doesn't seem to be so, right?

Bye,
Mosè