Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "Mosè" == Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:

   > 2016-09-17 18:41 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer <address@hidden>:
   >> but what is with the issue of sending patches with
   >> correspond to my private branches but might include (for you) unwanted
   >> revsets? That is not acceptable? I should collapse them?

   > What do you refer to?

Here is a patch how I thought sending it. Note please that it cannot be
applied anymore since you already applied the patch.....



   >> [1]  I see hg facing the same fate as Xemacs, beautiful but not preferred
   >> by most users....

   > I don't have anything against Mercurial, and you can work with hg-git
   > if it works well, but it doesn't seem to be so, right?


Not sure, but for sure I have learned something about mercurial, which
at the end could not really use for the purpose of auctex. ....


   > Bye,
   > Mosè

bidi1911.patch
Description: Text Data