[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] (setq TeX-auto-save t) really necessary?
From: |
Uwe Siart |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] (setq TeX-auto-save t) really necessary? |
Date: |
Mon, 09 May 2005 16:52:55 +0200 |
On 9 May 2005 at 16:33, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> If you open a slave file, AUCTeX will neither open the master file and
> parse it, nor will it open other slave files because it does not now
> about them. It relies on such information to be stored in the `auto'
> subdirectory. By not enabling `TeX-auto-save', you are effectively
> dumping the advantages of parsing in multi-file documents.
But what if I include
%%% Local Variables:
%%% TeX-master: "masterfile.tex"
%%% End:
in all slave files instead? Doesn't AUCTeX know about the full document
structure then?
I ask because I work this way each day - and RefTeX does a quite good
job in parsing the whole document. It produces the toc, shows all
labels, and so on. So I thought, AUCTeX will do this as well, doesn't
it?
--
Uwe