[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] (setq TeX-auto-save t) really necessary?
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] (setq TeX-auto-save t) really necessary? |
Date: |
Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
* Uwe Siart (2005-05-09) writes:
> But what if I include
>
> %%% Local Variables:
> %%% TeX-master: "masterfile.tex"
> %%% End:
>
> in all slave files instead? Doesn't AUCTeX know about the full document
> structure then?
No.
> I ask because I work this way each day - and RefTeX does a quite good
> job in parsing the whole document. It produces the toc, shows all
> labels, and so on. So I thought, AUCTeX will do this as well, doesn't
> it?
No, it doesn't. But I would not object if somebody implemented this
as a customizable feature.
--
Ralf