Re: [avr-gcc-list] New prosessor goes into stack violation!

[Ben L. Titzer]

Perhaps the size of the initialized data section is larger than the 
available RAM left over after allocating a stack? What is the value of 
the SP register at this point?

-B

On Jan 7, 2005, at 9:22 AM, E. Weddington wrote:

> Per Arnold Blåsmo wrote:
>
> > Hi you gurus :-)
> >
> > I need some help her to get the code for AT90SC3232CS running.
> > As some of you might have seen, I have tried to make avr-libc work 
> > for the secureAVR chip AT90SC3232CS.
> >
> > My compiler chain works, and I am abel to make a small "hello world" 
> > app. work.
> > But when running a larger app, the program crashes in the startup 
> > code.
> >
> > It starts the __do_copy_data  routine and enter the  
> > .do_copy_data_loop.  But after  a number of iterations it crashes and
> > says "stack violation".  I am not sure that is  the correct error, 
> > because on the emulator it light up "illegal address".
> >
> > It happens when the operation 'ST X+, R0' executes and X=0x00fe.
>
> Could this address be in the interrupt vector table for the device?
>
> Perhaps your header file did not properly account for all the vectors 
> or all the correct defintions?
>
> Eric
>
> _______________________________________________
> avr-gcc-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
========================================================
I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that 
here and there.
--Richard Feynman