|
From: | E. Weddington |
Subject: | [avr-libc-dev] Re: Missing copyrights? |
Date: | Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:45:24 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) |
Theodore A. Roth wrote:
I agree with you about the files above and wanting them to go away too. The canonical GNU method for building a package is (configure; make; make install). The do* scripts and reconf really don't fit that model. I'll go ahead and put copyrights on the files, but I'll also start giving it some thought about getting rid of these. I'll make an item in the TODO.On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, E. Weddington wrote:Ted, Here's a list of files in avr-libc that have a missing copyright. Some of them I'm sure are yours. Others I'm not so sure. acconfig.h avr-libc.spec.inI wrote those.config-ml.incame from newlib I think too. Reinhard Jessich added this. I _really_ want it go away because it's not very maintainable.doconf dodist domake reconfReinhard Jessich <address@hidden> wrote those. I want these to go away too eventually but feel free to add copyrights for them is needed. Check the cvs logs to see what years apply according when changes were made.
Thanks. One note though: acconfig.h just has the two-clause license. While I'm at it, can I have your permission to fix all of your copyrighted files in avr-libc to add the missing clause?xml/Validate.py devtools/cr_check.pyI wrote those. I have just added copyrights to the files I wrote in CVS HEAD. [See attached patch.]
Eric
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |