[avr-libc-dev] autoconf branch [was: Re: Missing copyrights?]

[E. Weddington]

Theodore A. Roth wrote:

> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, E. Weddington wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, E. Weddington wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >      
> > >
> > > > config-ml.in
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > doconf
> > > > dodist
> > > > domake
> > > > reconf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >        
> > > Reinhard Jessich  <address@hidden> wrote those. I want
> > > these to go away too eventually
> > >
> > >      
> > Um, in looking around the CVS I noticed this entry, at the top:
> > <http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/avr-libc/avr-libc/doconf>
> >
> > It looks like you *did* get rid of these files on the autoconf branch.
> >
> > So, I won't even bother putting a copyright notice on them.
> >
> > But I will ask: when will that branch be merged into HEAD? :-)
> >    
>
> I have no idea when it will be merged. It's still experimental and
> depends on changes to binutils and gcc.
>
>  

In going back and re-reading the archives, doesn't the changes to 
binutils and gcc affect only the move to per-device multilibs?

Can't the upgrade to autoconf-2.57 and automake-1.7.x be separated from 
the per-device multilibs stuff?

Eric