[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Release?
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Release? |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:43:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
As E. Weddington wrote:
> I would vote for a 1.2.0 release, even if some of the planned things
> aren't ready.
Only curious, are there any opinions as for rolling *two* releases, a
1.0.5 just with what's up there (plus maybe the math bug fix), and a
1.2.0 straight from HEAD?
Sure, next WinAVR will only pick one of them (1.2.0 it seems, for the
new device support), but I'm not sure whether there are also other
people who care for the backwards compatibility.
Technically, it's not that much more of work for me, so I'm open for
this option as well.
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
- [avr-libc-dev] Release?, E. Weddington, 2004/12/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Release?,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Release?, E. Weddington, 2004/12/14
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Release?, Paul Schlie, 2004/12/14
- [avr-libc-dev] Newlib [was: Re: Release?], E. Weddington, 2004/12/14
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: Newlib [was: Re: Release?], Paul Schlie, 2004/12/14
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: Newlib [was: Re: Release?], E. Weddington, 2004/12/14
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: Newlib [was: Re: Release?], E. Weddington, 2004/12/14
- [avr-libc-dev] SIMULAVR / Test suite, Björn Haase, 2004/12/14
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIMULAVR / Test suite, Paul Schlie, 2004/12/14
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIMULAVR / Test suite, E. Weddington, 2004/12/14
- AW: [avr-libc-dev] SIMULAVR / Test suite for binutils and gcc, Björn Haase, 2004/12/19