[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf
From: |
Paul Schlie |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:46:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 |
> From: "E. Weddington" <address@hidden>
>> Paul Schlie wrote:
>>> From: "E. Weddington" <address@hidden>
>>> Joerg,
>>>
>>> Do you think the version checking in the reconf script is strictly
>>> necessary?
>>> How do you feel about it's removal?
>>>
>>
>> Personally wouldn't mind if all the reconf/doXXX scripts
>> disappeared in favor of an updated configure/make.
>>
>> (ideally using more recent autoXXX scripts if
>> someone can figure how to do it construct them)
>>
> Thank you for your opinion. Do you have a patch?
No, sorry, I'm not sufficiently skilled to do it justice,
You?
- [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05