[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:59:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
As Paul Schlie wrote:
> Personally wouldn't mind if all the reconf/doXXX scripts
> disappeared in favor of an updated configure/make.
reconf is just a helper to make it easier for the user to run
autoconf/make/foo/bar in the correct order. At least *I* can never
remember which one to run first. It is currently also a helper to
pick up the correct autofoo version, as the auto tools seem to be
proud of breaking their API every now and then.
You don't need the do{conf,make} scripts at all. (Ted Roth recently
wrote me he never used them all the time.) They are again only
helper scripts to descend into a subdir, and start the ../configure
from there, or the ${MAKE} within the subdir resp.
Building directly in the toplevel dir isn't even supported for GCC, so
the subdir trick is the only `magic' covered by these scripts.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05