[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11505] inp()/outp() comments in ./include/avr/sfr_
From: |
Mudiaga Obada |
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11505] inp()/outp() comments in ./include/avr/sfr_defs.h outdated |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:19:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041122 |
This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
of the project: AVR C Runtime Library.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #11505] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Mudiaga Obada <address@hidden>
'Date:
Mit 05.01.2005 at 21:54 (GMT)
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Ok, i see what
#if _SFR_IO_REG_P(SPMCR)
out _SFR_IO_ADDR(SPMCR), r24
#else
sts _SFR_MEM_ADDR(SPMCR), r24
#endif
has to do with __SFR_OFFSET. Please ignore that part of the previous message.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #11505] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11505>
Project: AVR C Runtime Library
Submitted by: Mudiaga Obada
On: Mit 05.01.2005 at 21:41
Category: Documentation
Severity: 5 - Average
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: None
Resolution: None
Privacy: Public
Percent Complete: 0%
Assigned to: None
Originator Email: address@hidden
Status: Open
Summary: inp()/outp() comments in ./include/avr/sfr_defs.h outdated
Original Submission: It seems like the documentation in
./include/avr/sfr_defs.h was left in there after inX()/outX() support was
removed.
The following should be removed:
<quote>
The old inp()/outp() macros are still supported, but not recommended to use
in new code. The order of outp() arguments is confusing. </quote>
Also the lines
#if _SFR_IO_REG_P(SPMCR)
out _SFR_IO_ADDR(SPMCR), r24
#else
sts _SFR_MEM_ADDR(SPMCR), r24
#endif
look stray, since i can't tell from their (stand alone) context what they are
there for. Also, the comments that follow it looks strage to me...
For my oppinion (which i know comes rather late), no longer having inX()/outX()
and cbi()/sbi() support is unfortunate. There's lot of existing code that uses
it, and it can be really inconvinient - especially for those new to
gcc/avr-libc.
Follow-up Comments
------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mit 05.01.2005 at 21:54 By: Mudiaga Obada <obada>
Ok, i see what
#if _SFR_IO_REG_P(SPMCR)
out _SFR_IO_ADDR(SPMCR), r24
#else
sts _SFR_MEM_ADDR(SPMCR), r24
#endif
has to do with __SFR_OFFSET. Please ignore that part of the previous message.
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11505>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/