|
From: | Elias Mårtenson |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-apl] Announce: APL function editor written in APL |
Date: | Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:30:00 +0800 |
Dear Elias,Do you already have a layout? That would save a lot of time. Do you have a special keyboard config file for it too?Thanks!BlakeOn Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Elias Mårtenson <address@hidden> wrote:
I'd suggest you get a keyboard here: http://www.wasdkeyboards.com/Not only are they keyboards nice (I have one). They also allow you to design the keycaps exactly as you want to. You can even upload the exact graphics you want.Regards,EliasOn 3 June 2014 13:09, Blake McBride <address@hidden> wrote:
Thanks. I need a new keyboard. Not only does the Unicomp keyboard not have those two functions, it's missing others too.What do you recommend?Thanks.BlakeOn Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Elias Mårtenson <address@hidden> wrote:
It's a primitive function. They are described in section 10.2.17 and 10.2.18 of the standard.
Regards,EliasOn 3 June 2014 12:04, Blake McBride <address@hidden> wrote:On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Chris Jones <address@hidden> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:05:01PM EDT, Blake McBride wrote:Per the output of ]keyb you would need to hit the quote key (left of
> Thanks. That operator is not on my keyboard, and cutting-and-pasting
> it into GNU APL (unless I am making a mistake) doesn't accept it
> either.
enter) on a US keyboard + whatever modifier you use to produce APL
symbold.
Not sure if it's a primitive function or an operator. I see it briefly
> Am I missing something (like a better keyboard)? Is that a standard
> (IBM defined) operator?
mentioned as "left tack" p. 474 in Appendix A of the APL2 Language
Reference.That manual lists those _characters_ but does not associate any operation to it. I think it is not an IBM APL 2 operator.
CJ
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |