[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA
From: |
Kacper Gutowski |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:53:44 +0100 |
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Juergen Sauermann
<address@hidden> wrote:
> the IBM APL2 language reference says (page 111):
>
> If R is a simple scalar, ⊂ R is R. If R is not a simple scalar, the depth of
> R is 1+ ≡R.
>
> And the ISO standard says the same (page 169):
>
> Z ← ⊂B
> Note: If B is a simple-scalar, Z is B.
Jay is nevertheless correct, because ⊂x is NOT a simple-scalar
according to ISO. On page 21 it has the following definitions:
> Simple: An array is simple if each item of its ravel-list is either
> a character or a number.
> Simple-scalar: A simple array whose rank is zero.
The sole item of ⊂x is an enclosed array, not a character or number.
-k
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/01
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Christian Robert, 2016/03/01
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Jay Foad, 2016/03/02
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/02
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Nick Lobachevsky, 2016/03/02
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Jay Foad, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Jay Foad, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Jay Foad, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA,
Kacper Gutowski <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Mike Duvos, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/03/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Mike Duvos, 2016/03/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/03/06
Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA, Christian Robert, 2016/03/01