[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] RNG
From: |
Xiao-Yong Jin |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] RNG |
Date: |
Wed, 18 May 2016 17:37:30 -0500 |
Now,
(22⍴8)⊤2⊥63⍴1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dyalog does the same thing.
Can someone please explain to me why?
> On May 18, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Kacper,
>
> yes, thanks. Fixed in *SVN 729*.
>
> /// Jürgen
>
>
> On 05/18/2016 07:29 PM, Kacper Gutowski wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
>> (...)
>>> relying on ¯1=2⊥64⍴1 (always a 64-bit signed integer), for which Dyalog
>>> does differently.
>> I think this is a bug.
>>
>> -k
>>
>
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/17
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Xiao-Yong Jin, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Xiao-Yong Jin, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/19
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/05/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG,
Xiao-Yong Jin <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] RNG, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/05/19