[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces
From: |
Dr . Jürgen Sauermann |
Subject: |
Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Apr 2020 21:04:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
Hi Blake,
I could live with 1. and 3. (which can be fixed in ⎕CR alone).
However, 2. is not needed for this and it conflicts with 1. because
at least the .xml files store the internal representation in XML format.
The IBM ∇-editor is quite rigid in removing indentation but
I rather see that as a disadvantage. If you look into my C++
source files then you will notice that I have put quite some
effort into indentation. I strongly believe that good indentation
leads to better readability of code and we should allow that
in APL as well.
Best regards,
Jürgen
On 4/8/20 8:31 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> How about this for a set of rules:
>
> 1. Format .apl and .XML files any way you like.
>
> 2. Regardless of how a function is instantiated (.apl, .XML, ⎕FX, the
> del editor) the internal representation is all lines left-justified.
> Leading and trailing spaces for each line from the source are stripped
> away.
>
> 3. The del editor displays a function as it does now - but the
> leading spaces are added by the del editor for display.
>
> This way, ⎕CR will be correct (left-justified) and the del editor will
> display a consistent output regardless of how the function was
> instantiated.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Blake
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:14 PM Dr. Jürgen Sauermann
> <mail@jürgen-sauermann.de <mailto:mail@j%C3%BCrgen-sauermann.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi Blake,
>
> the problem is that there are no rules for the formatting of the
> functions. I know
> that you had a few proposals in the past, but I haven't found a
> proper mental model
> of how to handle this.
>
> Please note that the .apl files are not only used to store
> workspaces, but also for
> creating apl source files (they are my default way of writing apl
> code). Therefore
> formatting in a somewhat readable format is also an aspect
> concerning .apl files.
>
> As far as I can see the only real question is how leading spaces
> shall be handled.
> This needs to be clarified for:
>
> 1. the ∇-editor
> 2. ⎕CR
> 3. )SAVE/LOADed files
> 4. )DUMP/LOADed files
>
> If you could come up with set of rules how to handle this in a
> consistent
> way (and satisfying everybody's requirements), then I can try to
> implement
> them.
>
> I am not a day-to-day user of APL2, so I can't really tell how
> that one is/was
> supposed to work. My first version of the GNU APL ∇-editor came
> from a vague
> recollection of the ∇-editor in APL68000 back in the 1980s.
>
> It is true that the way functions look depends on how the files
> look like. But that
> is on purpose. Otherwise you would loose leading spaces in the
> function text.
> Ig the ∇-editor would remove them then I would consider that more
> as a fault
> than a feature.
>
> Best regards,
> Jürgen
>
>
> On 4/8/20 7:30 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
>> Thanks. While it appears to work, it's clearly wrong. The
>> formatting is still being done at the wrong place. The way I
>> discovered this is to load a .apl file from a prior version of
>> GNU APL. When I list the function, it's wrong. So, GNU APL is
>> depending on the format in the file rather than having the del
>> editor format it. For example:
>>
>> )load Utils.apl
>> DUMPED 2019-10-27 12:10:43 (GMT-6)
>> ∇Pin[⎕]∇
>> ∇
>> [0] n←v Pin q;m;t
>> [1] ⍝ Input one or more numbers
>> [2] ⍝ v[1] = minimum value (inclusive)
>> [3] ⍝ v[2] = maximum value (inclusive)
>> [4] ⍝ v[3] = numeric increment (i.e. 1 = integer)
>> [5] ⍝ Remining values are optional
>> [6] ⍝ v[4] = minimum number of numbers
>> [7] ⍝ v[5] = maximum number of numbers
>> [8] ⍝ v[6] = default value of empty entry (or ¯1 means no default)
>> [9] ⍝ v[7+] = numbers the entered value cannot be
>> [10] ⍝ q is the prompt
>> [11] t←⍳0
>> [12] ⍎(3=⍴v)/'v←v,1 1'
>> [13] m←v[5]
>> [14] LP:→(m=⍴t)/EN3
>> [15] EN1:→(EHN n←CS PI q,'?')/0,0,EN2
>> [16] →(v[⍳5]Lck n)/EN1
>> [17] n[Omega n='-']←'¯'
>> [18] →(∨/(n←⍎n)∈6↓v)/ER1
>> [19] t←t,n
>> [20] v[5]←v[5]-⍴,n
>> [21] →LP
>> [22] EN2: →(0≠⍴t)/EN3
>> [23] →(5=⍴v)/0
>> [24] →(v[6]=¯1)/0
>> [25] t←v[,6]
>> [26] EN3:⍎'n←',((m=1)/'''''⍴'),'t'
>> [27] →0
>> [28] ER1:→EN1 ∆ ER(⍕n), ' already exists; Please reenter.'
>> ∇
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Blake
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:58 AM Dr. Jürgen Sauermann
>> <mail@jürgen-sauermann.de <mailto:mail@j%C3%BCrgen-sauermann.de>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Blake,
>>
>> thanks, hopefully fixed in *SVN 1256*.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Jürgen
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/8/20 4:18 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
>>> Also, and further showing the point that the formatting is
>>> occurring at the wrong place:
>>>
>>> ⎕CR 'ABC'
>>> ABC
>>> x←4
>>> EN1: Y←5
>>> Z←7
>>> ⍝ THIS IS A COMMENT
>>> Z←5
>>>
>>> Those space characters before each line should never happen
>>> but does when the file is loaded from a .APL file.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Blake
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:56 AM Blake McBride
>>> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Lastly, I should mention that the first display of ABC
>>> is the correct one, and the one that matched IBM APL.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Blake
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:46 AM Blake McBride
>>> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Echoing some thoughts I've had on this subject,
>>> given the trouble we've had with function
>>> formatting over the years between the del editor
>>> and ⎕CR, I get the impression that function
>>> formatting is occurring at the wrong place. I think
>>> internally functions should be stored left-justified
>>> always. The del editor would then be the one adding
>>> the formatting for comments and labels. This way
>>> there wouldn't be ongoing problems between the del
>>> editor, save, dump, and ⎕CR.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Blake
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:36 AM Blake McBride
>>> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Look at the formatting. In particular look at
>>> how the lines with labels and comments are
>>> indented. They are indented differently
>>> depending on whether the file is saved or dumped.
>>>
>>> ∇ABC[⎕]∇
>>> ∇
>>> [0] ABC
>>> [1] X←4
>>> [2] EN1: Y←5
>>> [3] Z←7
>>> [4] ⍝ THIS IS A COMMENT
>>> [5] Z←5
>>> ∇
>>> )save test
>>> 2020-04-08 08:30:48 (GMT-5)
>>> )dump test
>>> 2020-04-08 08:30:52 (GMT-5)
>>> )load test
>>>
>>> WARNING: filename /home/blake/workspaces/test
>>> is ambiguous because another file
>>> /home/blake/workspaces/test.apl
>>> exists as well. Using the first.
>>>
>>> SAVED 2020-04-08 08:30:48 (GMT-5)
>>> ∇ABC[⎕]∇
>>> ∇
>>> [0] ABC
>>> [1] X←4
>>> [2] EN1: Y←5
>>> [3] Z←7
>>> [4] ⍝ THIS IS A COMMENT
>>> [5] Z←5
>>> ∇
>>> )load test.apl
>>> DUMPED 2020-04-08 08:30:52 (GMT-5)
>>> ∇ABC[⎕]∇
>>> ∇
>>> [0] ABC
>>> [1] X←4
>>> [2] EN1: Y←5
>>> [3] Z←7
>>> [4] ⍝ THIS IS A COMMENT
>>> [5] Z←5
>>> ∇
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Blake
>>>
>>
>
- Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/08
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/08
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/08
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/08
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Dr . Jürgen Sauermann, 2020/04/08
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/08
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Dr . Jürgen Sauermann, 2020/04/08
- Message not available
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/08
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces,
Dr . Jürgen Sauermann <=
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/08
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Dr . Jürgen Sauermann, 2020/04/09
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/09
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Dr . Jürgen Sauermann, 2020/04/09
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/09
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/09
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Dr . Jürgen Sauermann, 2020/04/10
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Elias Mårtenson, 2020/04/10
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/10
- Message not available
- Re: Loading .apl files differes from .xml workspaces, Blake McBride, 2020/04/10