|
From: | Oğuz |
Subject: | Re: 5.3-alpha: the `jobs' builtin prints foreground dead jobs with function substitutions |
Date: | Wed, 1 May 2024 21:39:53 +0300 |
On Tuesday, April 30, 2024, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote: > > comsubs). I can work around this case, but I'm still interested in what > people think the general rule should be. > I don't think anyone would expect to run `jobs' and see anything but asynchronous and stopped jobs. -- Oğuz
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |