Re: 5.3-alpha: the `jobs' builtin prints foreground dead jobs with function substitutions

[Chet Ramey]

On 5/2/24 1:58 PM, Oğuz wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 8:44 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
> > I'm not planning to change the text. The point is whether or not this
> > counts as `notification' for the purposes of the jobs list, which allows
> > the shell to remove the job from the list.
>
> And what change of behavior discernible by the average user is
> counting that as such will bring?

Foreground jobs killed by signals won't be in the jobs list when word
expansion happens. The point of this, and the previous, thread.

--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature