[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:49:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 6/26/24 8:17 AM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024, 03:14 Chet Ramey, <chet.ramey@case.edu
<mailto:chet.ramey@case.edu>> wrote:
On 6/19/24 6:12 PM, konsolebox wrote:
> Alternatively, have BASH_SOURCE always produce real physical paths
> either by default or through a shopt.
This is the best option. I don't think changing bash to do this by
default would have negative side-effects.
Just to be clear, would this result in $0 and ${BASH_SOURCE[@]:(-1):1}
potentially yielding different values?
Yes.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, (continued)
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Martin D Kealey, 2024/07/07
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Oğuz, 2024/07/08
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Martin D Kealey, 2024/07/08
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/07/08
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Phi Debian, 2024/07/08
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Oğuz, 2024/07/08
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Chet Ramey, 2024/07/03
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH,
Chet Ramey <=
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Chet Ramey, 2024/07/03