bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH


From: alex xmb sw ratchev
Subject: Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 21:23:15 +0200

On Sun, Jul 7, 2024, 21:03 Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:

> On 7/3/24 5:32 PM, alex xmb sw ratchev wrote:
> > is this all about adding full path ? to sourcr / . ?
> > for this may add one varname , like BASH_SOURCE_FULL
> >
> > it seems to me , using BASH_SOURCE , if it doesnt start with / , prefix
> > $PWD , .. else its already
>
> The objection is that people don't want to have to do that -- what if you
> change directories after a relative path is added to BASH_SOURCE[n]?
>

hi ..
i dont get the BASH_SOURCE[n] one
the point of prefix $PWD/ infront of relative paths is a static part of
fitting into the first lines of the script , assigning vars
.. if u cd first then want the old relative path .. no go .. it must be
done at early codes

one argument is , preserving one to one strings as user passes including
relative paths like spawn script name

.. while also the need for absolute path is not less inportant
i see another var added . BASH_SOURCE_ABSOLUTE , or _REAL , or so , which
bash will fill the path
.. a question is still what to do with symlinks , maybe additional code is
needed

thanks .. greets ..

-- 
> ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
>                  ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
> Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]