|
From: | Chet Ramey |
Subject: | Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:02:28 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 7/11/24 3:51 AM, konsolebox wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 4:08 AM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:and the BASH_SOURCE absolute pathname discussion has been bananas, so that's not going in any time soon.Maybe just create BASH_SOURCE_REAL instead to avoid the gripes.
I don't think so. It's not very useful to have two variables that are so similar -- it's needless overhead. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |