[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: waiting for process substitutions
From: |
Dale R. Worley |
Subject: |
Re: waiting for process substitutions |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:27:08 -0400 |
Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> writes:
> Some scripts use something like this:
> ...
> exec > >(command ...) ...
I've used that construction quite a few times myself. I'm not
requesting that the resulting process be waitable, but certainly
whatever the maintainers design should take into account that this is an
important construction for practical purposes.
Dale
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Mark March, 2024/07/02
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/07/03
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Martin D Kealey, 2024/07/03
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/07/03
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/07/05
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Greg Wooledge, 2024/07/05
- Re: waiting for process substitutions,
Dale R. Worley <=
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/07/08
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/07/08
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/07/08
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/07/08
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Greg Wooledge, 2024/07/08
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/07/08
Re: waiting for process substitutions, Dale R. Worley, 2024/07/04
Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/07/05