[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable
From: |
bash |
Subject: |
Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Aug 2024 10:02:43 +0200 |
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:14:38AM +0200, Ángel wrote:
> For big values such as 0.5, that delay is unlikely to be relevant, but
> one should not assume the sleep will be exactly the specified amount
> and no more.
>
Yes, of course. For this use case I doubt scheduling within the kernel
is relevant but it is a valid point to have in mind! Thanks.
>
>
>
- Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, (continued)
- Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, bash, 2024/08/06
- Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/07
- Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, G. Branden Robinson, 2024/08/07
- Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/07
- Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, felix, 2024/08/15
- Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, Bash-help, 2024/08/15
- Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, Martin D Kealey, 2024/08/18
Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/06
Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, Ángel, 2024/08/06
- Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable,
bash <=