[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC
|
From: |
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au |
|
Subject: |
[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC |
|
Date: |
7 Aug 2007 01:27:45 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07
01:27 -------
As Nick says, current x86-aout scripts have . = 0.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4515
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC,
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au <=
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, Quentin dot Godfroy at ens dot fr, 2007/08/07
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/07
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/07
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/08
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/08
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/08
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/09