[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC
From: |
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC |
Date: |
7 Aug 2007 23:06:38 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07
23:06 -------
Oops. Indeed, i486-linux-aout has this problem. Both Nick and I checked
i486-aout, assuming that it was the same target as i486-linux-aout.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4515
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/06
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, Quentin dot Godfroy at ens dot fr, 2007/08/07
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC,
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au <=
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/07
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/08
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/08
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/08
- [Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/08/09