[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte prope
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:34:23 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19713
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 9084
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9084&action=edit
Fix some places in the BFD library where octets vs bytes matter
Hi Dan,
> The enclosed patch should fix most all of the problems with bugs 19713,
> 19715, 19716, 19717, and 19718. In particular, it resolves the "FIXME:
> octets per byte" issues found within bfd/elflink.c
That patch is rather noisy - lots of unneeded comments, fprintfs, and so on.
Instead I would apply this version of the patch instead. Are you OK with this
?
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412, dgisselq at ieee dot org, 2016/03/10
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412,
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412, dgisselq at ieee dot org, 2016/03/10
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2016/03/11
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412, nickc at redhat dot com, 2016/03/11