[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte prope
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412 |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 03:53:17 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19713
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 9086
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9086&action=edit
Same patch. made against 2.25 sources
Hi Dan,
> All of these changes look good. Is there an easy way that I can get the
> updated file to test it? It doesn't match what I'm using from 2.25, and it
> looks like you've compared directly against git.
Well against the mainline development sources yes. You can get an anonymous
read-only copy of the mainline sources by using this command:
git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
Alternatively you can use the variant of the patch that I have uploaded here.
This version should apply cleanly to the 2.25 sources.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412, dgisselq at ieee dot org, 2016/03/10
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412, nickc at redhat dot com, 2016/03/10
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412, dgisselq at ieee dot org, 2016/03/10
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2016/03/11
- [Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412,
nickc at redhat dot com <=