|
From: | i at maskray dot me |
Subject: | [Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jan 2021 01:11:56 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 --- Comment #5 from Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> --- The explanation is not convincing. foo and foo@v1 are two different symbols. My example does not use an undefined symbol so I don't see how > shouldn't be used by ld to satisfy the unversioned reference. is relevant. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |