[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and i
From: |
bdrung at posteo dot de |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Aug 2024 20:45:35 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #25 from Benjamin Drung <bdrung at posteo dot de> ---
(In reply to Luca Boccassi from comment #24)
> (In reply to Benjamin Drung from comment #23)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > > (In reply to Benjamin Drung from comment #13)
> > >
> > > Will adding support for "%[string]" to existing
> > > --package-metadata option break anything?
> >
> > It might theoretical break existing use cases.
> >
> > --package-metadata='{"version":"1.0%2"}'
>
> Are there distros where '%' is an allowed character in a version string or a
> package name? I care about backward compatibility, but we can be sensible
> about it, and if in practice it's not a problem, then it's fine to do such a
> change
For all Debian-based distros: % is neither allowed in the package name nor in
the package version. Who wants to check the other 400 distributions?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bdrung at posteo dot de, 2024/08/09
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bluca at debian dot org, 2024/08/09
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile,
bdrung at posteo dot de <=
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bluca at debian dot org, 2024/08/09
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bdrung at posteo dot de, 2024/08/09
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bluca at debian dot org, 2024/08/10
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, dilfridge at gentoo dot org, 2024/08/10
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/08/10
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bdrung at posteo dot de, 2024/08/12