[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and i
From: |
bdrung at posteo dot de |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:24:49 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #31 from Benjamin Drung <bdrung at posteo dot de> ---
(In reply to Andreas K. Huettel from comment #29)
> >
> > Option A: Introduce a new --encoded-package-metadata parameter that takes
> > the encoded string.
> >
> > Option B: Extend --package-metadata to always decode the given string. As
> > previously discussed, package names and version should not contain percent
> > characters. So this change should not break backward compatibility.
> >
>
> What are you going to do once you run into command line length limits
> (which can be hidden in many places)?
>
> (How much mystery data are we really talking about here?)
The command line length limit is probably around 128 KB on Linux. The package
metadata contains only a few items. The examples given in this bug report are
real world examples. So even with encoding this example is around 250
characters. With longer package/version and added debuginfod URL, you might get
500 or up to 1000 characters. This is probably still far enough away from the
command line length limit.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bdrung at posteo dot de, 2024/08/09
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bluca at debian dot org, 2024/08/09
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bdrung at posteo dot de, 2024/08/09
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bluca at debian dot org, 2024/08/09
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bdrung at posteo dot de, 2024/08/09
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, bluca at debian dot org, 2024/08/10
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, dilfridge at gentoo dot org, 2024/08/10
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/08/10
- [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile,
bdrung at posteo dot de <=