[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bison 1.30f
From: |
Axel Kittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: Bison 1.30f |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 08:35:33 +0100 |
> Are you saying that POSIX specifies how "/" should be interpreted in a
> C/C++ #include statement? -- I doubt it; the C++ standard, verses 16.2:2-3,
> says:
Hans. don't mismatch the ANSI C standard with the POSIX Operating System
standard (which includes some C standard library definitons, and how they
have to behave).
But honestly I've personally read neither so I cannot tell what they specify
exactly, I only live with their effects to common computing live.
- Axel
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/05
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/06
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/06
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/10
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/10
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/10
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/11
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f,
Axel Kittenberger <=
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/13
- Message not available
- Bison & C++, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13