[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bison 1.30f
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Bison 1.30f |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:11:09 -0800 (PST) |
> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:31:47 +0100
> From: Hans Aberg <address@hidden>
>
> Is there any platform with alloca in a header with a different name?
Sure. Some platforms have alloca but don't have <alloca.h> at all.
That is the old, traditional behavior.
alloca is notoriously nonstandardized, which is why "include
<alloca.h>" is so carefully protected in bison.simple.
- Re: Bison 1.30f, (continued)
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/10
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/10
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/10
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/11
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Axel Kittenberger, 2001/12/11
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/13
- Message not available
- Bison & C++, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison & C++, Axel Kittenberger, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison & C++, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Mike Castle, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/10