[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion regarding header files...
From: |
David Sugar |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion regarding header files... |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Nov 2002 10:56:42 -0500 (EST) |
Yes, re-reading this, this makes perfect sense.
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Federico Montesino Pouzols wrote:
>
> I see. your solution seems much better. We will also have to
> put the '#include <xml.h>' in common.h inside an #ifdef. And we should
> also apply the #error idea to ftp.h and piostream, which are optional
> too.
>
> If there is no objection, this will be done within a few days.
>
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 07:39:17PM -0600, Ari Johnson wrote:
> >
> > If you compiled without XML support, but you try to include cc++/xml.h,
> > you should be informed that you're trying to use a part of the library
> > that you didn't install. I think that xml.h is a good place to put this,
> > and also that it should be an #error (just like trying to start a car
> > without an engine is an error and not something that can be ignored as a
> > warning).
> > -- Ari Johnson
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
>
- Suggestion regarding header files..., Ari Johnson, 2002/11/01
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2002/11/01
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Ari Johnson, 2002/11/01
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2002/11/02
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., David Sugar, 2002/11/02
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2002/11/02
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Ari Johnson, 2002/11/02
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2002/11/13
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., David Sugar, 2002/11/13
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files...,
David Sugar <=