[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion regarding header files...
From: |
Federico Montesino Pouzols |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion regarding header files... |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:51:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
It is in CVS for next releases.
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 09:50:16PM -0600, Ari Johnson wrote:
>
> I like that solution.
>
> On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Federico Montesino Pouzols wrote:
>
> >
> > Currently, the autoconf stuff defines two symbols:
> > COMMON_XML_PARSING (A) and HAVE_LIBXML (B). Only B is used for the
> > #ifdefs. Using both A and B we could do things like this:
> >
> > #if defined(A) && defined(B)
> > // libxml based stuff as it is currently defined.
> > #if defined(A) && !defined(B)
> > // at present, #error "libxml not installed"
> > // in the future, check another HAVE_... alternative xml lib.
> > #if !defined(A)
> > // put in xml.cpp something like #warning "XML support is not
> > // being compiled, are you sure?". And put in xml.h #error
> > // "XML support not available"
> >
- Suggestion regarding header files..., Ari Johnson, 2002/11/01
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2002/11/01
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Ari Johnson, 2002/11/01
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2002/11/02
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., David Sugar, 2002/11/02
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2002/11/02
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., Ari Johnson, 2002/11/02
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files...,
Federico Montesino Pouzols <=
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., David Sugar, 2002/11/13
- Re: Suggestion regarding header files..., David Sugar, 2002/11/02