Re: [Bug-ddrescue] GNU ddrescue 1.18-pre1 released

[Scott Dwyer]

The programmer in me would like detail, so "1:30:00" would be my 
preference. But I think that if this option is chosen, then it should be 
in the format something like "0d:1h:30m:00s", so that there would be no 
mistake when looking at a glance.

With that being said, the human in me would be fine with the current 
format. Not really too concerned about seconds with run time, just 
really want something that I can look at so I can see about how long it 
has been running. Sometimes I might forget what day I started it and 
could use a reminder :)

On 8/9/2013 1:08 PM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> Scott Dwyer wrote:
> > I just ran a short test with the new logging options, and that could 
> > be some useful info when wanted :)
>
> Glad to know. :-)
>
>
> > Would it be possible to place the current total run time on the 
> > screen with the rest of the current data, and update it as the data 
> > on the screen is updated?
>
> Sure. What format do you all think that is better for "run time" and 
> "time since last successful read", the current "1.5h" or "1:30:00"?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Antonio.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-ddrescue mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue