Re: [Bug-ed] ed-0.7 - GFDL license not included

[Karl Berry]

    I think otherwise, but I am ccing Karl to be sure.
    If the licensing terms are not available for the receiver to read,
    how can he know what his rights are?
    Consider someone becoming a hard copy of the printed texinfo manual,
    for example. We want him to know what he can and cannot do with that
    copy of the manual.

Yes, for exactly the reasons you state, the FDL should be included in
the manual.  It's the same principle as including the GPL in the
distribution.

Antonio, please do this in your next release.

Thanks,
Karl