Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format

[Mike Warren]

"Hook" <address@hidden> writes:

> No Mike, it isn't. However, the Microsoft extras *are* proprietary.
> Particularly their own font definitions, their own style sheets [..]

There are standards for dynamic fonts and style-sheets. Unless Microsoft
wanders from these (quite likely, but I've never looked at the HTML from
Word) then there's no problem. If they *do*, then the non-conforming bits
can be ignored.

> You can't take a stance against MS Word and then accept blindly the
> specific, no-free version of HTML which the provided conversion tool
> gives.

Non-free, or just hard to convert? I'm not sure if MS can claim
ownership over their ``extensions'' to HTML or not...

-- 
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A  0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD